View Single Post
Old 10-04-2016, 08:02 AM   #71
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Given that an ever-increasing proportion of commerce is carried out online, excluding it from sales tax seems like an odd thing to do, in terms of tax revenue.
The law dates to the 90's and was intended to foster widespread commercial internet use by treating internet commerce like mail order: no tax without a physical presence. This, combined with the commerce clause of the constitution and past Supreme Court precedents render most of the so-called "Amazon" laws unconstitutional: states simply do not have the power to tax out-of-state companies selling to their residents or force them to be tax collectors for the state.

Whether the state is "losing" hypothetical revenues is irrelevant.
It's not as if they *own* the residents and can charge for access to their pocketbooks, though many politicians in and out of Congress act as if they do and portray not-raising-taxes as "cutting taxes". Americans aren't that close to serfdom.
Yet.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote