Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop
One of the major hurdles e-books have are periodic articles like this one, where people hold forth on why e-books aren't as good as paper while admitting they've never tried an e-reader. I was that guy up to the point I bought my first Nook: http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/27/...ce-real-books/ |
Sigh. Indeed, e-readers aren't paper books. They're better than books. I realized I would never go back to paper the first time I tried to tap a word to find its' definition.
In a paper book. And, for a second, wondered why it didn't work. Or wished I could enlarge the font a bit for my tired eyes.
No, neo-luddites like the author of that article can have their paper, and get out of the way so that we can get get on with the future.