Quote:
Originally Posted by slowsmile
Hitch....No, I'm not going there again with you because there's no point in regurgitating old immovable ground. I've already provided the reasons and the evidence for using named paragraph styles rather than html heading styles on this thread. That should be good enough for all the other posters to individually makeup their own minds on this issue.
Bill  |
Yes, William:
It had to be you, because
nobody else would state the rigamarole about heading styles and the LITB as fact, or that "everybody knows" or any of that. It's simply incorrect, just as was your repeated heated statements about DPI. Remember that?
I pointed you to myriad books of ours, on Amazon, using heading classes, that look perfectly fine in the LITB. If your theory is right, then ALL of our books should look WRONG in the LITB. But they don't. So, very simply, how do you explain that?
And lastly--for the VERY LAST TIME--I never, ever said that you could "only" build TOC's in Sigil using heading classes. That would be wrong. In fact, we don't use Sigil's built-in automagic TOC maker. We make them ourselves. I do, absolutely, use the automagic NCX maker when we are using Sigil. As we use other methods, including Epsilon, THOSE NCX & TOCs are all written by hand.
So, for the final time on this topic: the only person who INSISTS that if you use heading classes, that the LITB will come out poorly or incorrectly, is YOU. Just as you were 100% incorrect about the DPI/Images issue, you are wrong about this. Period. Yes, sure, maybe it happened To. You.
That doesn't mean that it happens to other people.
Hitch