Quote:
Originally Posted by Blossom
I have a problem with the article. I'm one as you all know that reads romance for romance. I don't need the sexy to enjoy a romance. I understand why it's used and it's fine when it advances the story but it seem to me this article brought out how many non romance readers think. Instead of correcting them about romance isn't about the sexy it's about the couple. It seemed to me she is saying. So what! She is saying women read these books because of the sexy. Very disheartening. I do know some do read it for that but the majority don't. Am I misunderstanding it?
Sent from my Nexus 7
|
I agree with you Blossom. That's how I read it too. I checked my Library and I don't have any books by her. If a book sounds like it has a lot of sex(y), I skip right by. I want Romance not sex...