Thread: FREE/BARGAIN - Romance + Discussion - 2016
View Single Post
Old 09-30-2016, 08:31 PM   #1497
Blossom
Treasure Seeker
Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Blossom's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,708
Karma: 26026435
Join Date: Mar 2010
Device: Kobo HD Glo, Kindles, Kindle Fires, Andriod Devices
Quote:
Originally Posted by copyrite View Post

ETA: From bustle.com, an article by Sarah MacLean on bashing of the romance genre.
I have a problem with the article. I'm one as you all know that reads romance for romance. I don't need the sexy to enjoy a romance. I understand why it's used and it's fine when it advances the story but it seem to me this article brought out how many non romance readers think. Instead of correcting them about romance isn't about the sexy it's about the couple. It seemed to me she is saying. So what! She is saying women read these books because of the sexy. Very disheartening. I do know some do read it for that but the majority don't. Am I misunderstanding it?

Sent from my Nexus 7
Blossom is offline   Reply With Quote