View Single Post
Old 09-29-2016, 02:15 AM   #5
GeoffR
Wizard
GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GeoffR's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,821
Karma: 19162882
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Te Riu-a-Māui
Device: Kobo Glo
Quote:
Originally Posted by oren64 View Post
I get the same result from the makepa64.exe, it didn't create a patch.
You didn't supply the two filename arguments.

Edit: here is what it looks like in WINE:
Code:
H:\development\patch>makepa32 test-old.txt test-new.txt
<Patch>
patch_name = `Unknown`
patch_enable = `no`
replace_bytes = 000018, 2E 0A 4F 6C 64 20 66 69, 2E 0A 4E 65 77 20 66 69
</Patch>

H:\development\patch>

Last edited by GeoffR; 09-29-2016 at 02:20 AM. Reason: Show WINE output
GeoffR is offline   Reply With Quote