The Underpants book above, mentions with high praise a novel I read a while back and loved -- so I'd best re-read it. Josephine Tey's "Daughter of Time" is completely a novel, set in modern times ... but the characters [i.e. Tey] raise *serious* questions about the world's opinion of England's Richard III, and also the killing of the "princes in the tower". As she points out, the *winners* wrote the history books. She examined other sources from the actual time period, and saw no such global condemnation of Richard III, nor any mention (till the next guy was on the throne) that he had been responsible for the killing of the princes. And that next guy was the one who benefitted .....
Even though it is itself fiction, the author, speaking through her characters, raises serious questions about what we *think* is truth and history.
(PS I recommend the book, too.) So this is ref: history books aren't always historical either.
Last edited by badgoodDeb; 09-26-2016 at 06:02 PM.
|