View Single Post
Old 09-19-2016, 05:26 PM   #130
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,705
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasper Hviid View Post
It can only be enjoyed if you do not care about seperating the actual events from the fiction.
Beg to differ. I care about that distinction, and STILL manage to enjoy historical fiction. But that's because I don't mind doing my own homework to check an author's work--fiction or non- (if I feel compelled to verify). I don't need an imaginary (and quite worthless) guarantee of authenticity for the historical aspects of a novel. It's a novel, not a textbook (which quite often, are no more prone to sustained levels accuracy than many novels are).

I think it's a mistake to think of Historical Fiction (merely a label like any other [sub]genre label, by the way) as being "fictionalized history". It's fiction ... with a historical setting. No more/no less.

I don't care if people don't "like" it. There's lots of subgenres I don't care for. But let's stop pretending this particular "label that helps people find fiction they enjoy" is anything to stress over. Let alone be considered "dangerous."

Last edited by DiapDealer; 09-19-2016 at 05:50 PM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote