View Single Post
Old 09-17-2016, 01:09 PM   #124
BearMountainBooks
Maria Schneider
BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BearMountainBooks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
I don't really like reading "straight-up" history. Too many facts, not enough action. I'm well aware that fictionalized historicals are "fictionalized." But, yanno, non-fiction history has been rewritten a few times too, usually for political reasons.

Jeffrey Hepple (now deceased) wrote The Angle of 1776 based on a local rumor/story. I enjoyed the heck out of it and I'd never have read a similar "factual" piece at all.

The same is true of Stone Song (Win Blevins). Never would have read a dry factual history book, but Blevins fictionalized the story and made it come alive. Was a really interesting read.
BearMountainBooks is offline   Reply With Quote