View Single Post
Old 09-14-2016, 05:19 AM   #1
BetterRed
null operator (he/him)
BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 21,640
Karma: 29710510
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
Bulk MDE S&R questions

A custom column date can be cleared via the purpose built button that is automatically created in the Bulk MDE Custom Columns tab. But it would suit my purposes better if I could do it via saved Bulk MDE S&R definition. I have two related Bulk S&R definitions - a_move_date, b_counter++ - this would be a third - d_clear date

So I am looking for a Bulk MDE S&R definition to clear a custom date
===============

Has anyone any thoughts on how I could get calibre to support lists of dates? I assume it can't be done without major effort.

So, my idea is to convert a date value into a YYYY-MM-DD formatted string and store that in a tag-like value. Should I ever want use any arithmetic or date template functions I would have to reconvert the strings back to dates.

So the question is - can someone furnish a Bulk MDE definition that will convert a custom date value into to a 'YYYY-MM-DD' string and append it to a custom tag-like value.

I would name the definition c_save_date
================

So now I would have the following definitions -- a_move_date, b_counter++, c_save_date, d_clear date -- that I would execute consecutively in that order.

Failure to execute the definitions in the right order, or inadvertently skipping a step, could result in data loss.

So, it would be useful if I could put those four definitions into a group and execute the group in a single operation, anyone have any thoughts on that?

BR

Last edited by BetterRed; 09-14-2016 at 06:33 AM.
BetterRed is offline   Reply With Quote