View Single Post
Old 09-05-2016, 08:22 AM   #21
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 773
Karma: 9999999
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Since we are dredging this up again, although it may not be fact, IMO, it is more likely than not (depending on usage patterns, and especially (I'm guessing) on the usage patterns of some (typical?) MR members).

If nothing else, provide people with "the facts" (battery size, expected life for different usage patterns, ...) so they can make an informed decision if they are concerned.
It's clearly perfectly reasonable to point out a concern that more frequent charge cycles, all other things being equal, could reduce lifetime, just as it is reasonable to point out that all other things aren't, in fact, equal and shallower charge cycles, reduced peak charge levels and other design decisions could increase lifetime.

What is unjustified is to claim, as Jon has done repeatedly, that the overall net effect will certainly be a reduced lifetime - we simply don't have enough detail to make such a claim and to do so is misleading.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote