View Single Post
Old 08-12-2016, 03:44 PM   #35
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffR View Post
Although it doesn't have detailed numbers, Kobo released a report that has some information suggesting that people with dedicated ereaders read faster, read more, and spend more on ebooks than those who read using apps on phones/tablets.

The article on Kobo's site has a link to the report.

From the section titled "What the device tells us" near the end of the report:

(By "device" they mean a dedicated ereader, rather than a tabet or phone with other functions. There are some numbers, but they involve terms such as "good" customers or "best" booklovers and you need to read the rest of the report to work out exactly what they mean by those terms.)
I think that makes sense. Phones have a smaller window space so it takes longer to read even one page and not everyone wants to carry around a tablet either. Ereaders have a good sized window area and are both very light weight and small without being too small.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote