Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinisajoy
I read the thread in question and none of the moderators ever said anything that could be remotely moderated.
|
Actually, you were a major participant in the thread in question and were responsible for several of the comments to which Orange Gelato referred. So let's get that out of the way first and have no "innocent" mistake about your partiality on the issue. As I was the person who started the thread in reference, and as a contributor, I am also by definition not impartial, but I think it is important to clarify that point.
Quote:
|
The OP got offended when people didn't say his video was great.
|
This is not what happened in my opinion, but I refer people reading this to examine that other thread to make their own informed decision.
Quote:
|
Then the OP that started this thread was vaguely threatening people (not the moderators) in that thread.
|
What are you talking about? There was nothing in the OP's comments on my thread that are REMOTELY threatening in any way. Once again people are free to verify this for themselves, but I have to admit that it is really incredibly irresponsible to make that such an accusation without providing a single shred of evidence.
Anyway, I applaud the OP for starting this thread and think it is an important conversation being had.
In addition, Sweatpea's assertion that:
Quote:
But, on one thing I am in agreement with the OP: a moderator should always be an exemplary poster. Which doesn't mean he or she can't have an opinion! Please let them have one, it makes discussions a lot more interresting. It's just that they should never post so that they have to be moderated, so to speak...
Today 01:19 PM
|
Simply is correct....no if, and or buts..... it is just right and the right thing for a moderator to do. I don't see how this behavior can cause ANYTHING bad to happen for anyone but, on the contrary, will have the tendency to uplift the dialogue of the forum.