MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

davidfor · 08-02-2016, 10:09 PM

I would choose the Touch 2.0. The original Touch is at least two years old, and could be five years old, and the battery is possibly starting to fade. The Touch 2.0 is at most a year old, so should be in better condition. They both have the same resolution screen, but I think the Touch 2.0 has a later version and should be clearer. Internal memory should be 2GB for the old and 4GB for the 2.0.

About the only advantage the original Touch had is the external SD card slot. The Touch 2.0 doesn't have one.

08-02-2016, 10:09 PM	#2
davidfor Grand Sorcerer Posts: 24,905 Karma: 47303824 Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Sydney, Australia Device: Kobo:Touch,Glo, AuraH2O, GloHD,AuraONE, ClaraHD, Libra H2O; tolinoepos	I would choose the Touch 2.0. The original Touch is at least two years old, and could be five years old, and the battery is possibly starting to fade. The Touch 2.0 is at most a year old, so should be in better condition. They both have the same resolution screen, but I think the Touch 2.0 has a later version and should be clearer. Internal memory should be 2GB for the old and 4GB for the 2.0. About the only advantage the original Touch had is the external SD card slot. The Touch 2.0 doesn't have one.