View Single Post
Old 08-02-2016, 11:17 AM   #51
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,679
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
I don't believe that to be the case at all (ARC disclaimers being required by the FTC). I don't read the FTC's Endorsement Guidelines that way. Suggested, recommended, enouraged... sure. But "Required I'm not picking up on at all. I think bloggers just scared themselves (and other "hobby" reviewers) into believing it had to be declared -- or else. Mountain out of a mole-hill type stuff, if you ask me.

If you have a huge website that publishers are advertising on and you're recieving piles and piles of ARCs in exchange for reviews, then and only then would I worry about any FTC suggestions.

But if you're not actually shilling for an author/publisher (and you're a hobby reviewer), then you have nothing to fear from the FTC, in my opinion.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 08-02-2016 at 11:19 AM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote