View Single Post
Old 01-26-2009, 06:34 PM   #60
lilac_jive
Grand Sorcerer
lilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud oflilac_jive has much to be proud of
 
lilac_jive's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,870
Karma: 27376
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
I think the copyright laws are immoral. think that breaking the laws is not good if it is allowed. But that does not automatically lead to the conclusion that the law breakers are scum or low-lifes. Using such terms just makes it harder for people to see the situation clearly. And I think that using such terms reflects an ideological standpoint that I do not agree with.

And if they are scum and low-lifes. What terms should you use for murderers?
I understand where you are coming from, but I will respectfully disagree. My point still lies in knowingly ripping people off.

Anyway, what I call murders, rapists, etc, is not appropriate language for the forum.
lilac_jive is offline   Reply With Quote