View Single Post
Old 08-02-2016, 02:50 AM   #39
Cyberman tM
Evangelist
Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cyberman tM ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Cyberman tM's Avatar
 
Posts: 439
Karma: 2248782
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austria
Device: Inkbook Prime; Icarus Illumina;ImcoV6l;EB600;Kobo
Note: I don't use Goodreads, so maybe what I say isn't applicable (or already there).

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Goodreads needs to make it so you cannot rate a book unless you've either marked it as read when it's before the release date (in case you have an advanced copy) or marked it as having read it after the release date.
You trust that people who rate a book without reading it would admit to not having read it?

If the site knows the publishing date, why not simply add an automated "Rated before official publishing date." comment?
That way the rater doesn't have to do anything, and you can decide if you want to trust the rating.
(Also, it should make it easy to sort them out, if they ever implement this. Or someone makes a browser script.)
Cyberman tM is offline   Reply With Quote