View Single Post
Old 08-01-2016, 08:53 AM   #10
meeera
Grand Sorcerer
meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
meeera's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,827
Karma: 68407974
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
All the programmers have to do is make sure the book has been marked as read before allowing anyone to rate and that the book has been released and that the dates fall within the release date. That would solve most of the problem. Sure people could cheat the system, but they would have to wait until after the book was released.
This has been done to death in the Goodreads feedback forums, and it's not going to change. Goodreads' stance has always been that the user alone gets to decide how and why they use stars. In addition, many many people on Goodreads read and review ARCs (I'm one of them), and stopping us from reviewing until after the release date would put a giant spanner in the works.

Bottom line is - why do you care? If you don't like a particular rating, or don't find it to be useful for your purposes, ignore it.

Last edited by meeera; 08-01-2016 at 08:57 AM.
meeera is offline   Reply With Quote