View Single Post
Old 07-29-2016, 03:58 PM   #40
Faterson
pokrývač škridiel
Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Faterson's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,525
Karma: 3300000
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Device: 3*iPad, SamsungNote & Tabs, 2*OnyxBoox, Huawei 8″, PocketBook
Of course: you can make a half-dysfunctional feature fully dysfunctional, or fully functional. The latter course of action is doubtlessly preferable.

But most of all: these options are not mutually exclusive. Even Jon, the greatest Adobe lover the universe has ever seen, admitted he wouldn't mind if Marvin gave its users several page-count options to choose from. So, what's the big deal? All the current turmoil stems from the fact that one particular "pages in book"-count option is currently being enforced for all Marvin users – and, it also happens to be internally inconsistent and causing conflict with how Marvin has, for years, treated page-counts since version 1.

Give us both (or 3, 4, 5...) page-count options to choose from for both "pages in chapter" and "pages in book", and everyone will be happy.
Faterson is offline   Reply With Quote