View Single Post
Old 07-27-2016, 09:32 PM   #30
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Generally speaking, a paper book does not change its own page numbering!
And multiple copies of the same edition of the paper book will always have the same page numbers.

Quote:
It's an extremely useful and time-honored concept.
That is precisely why I don't like it! It has a tremendous amount of legacy baggage associated with the term.

Using the @Faterson definition of a page does not make it any less subjective than using the @eschwartz definition.

...

Having seen more than enough cases of people actually expecting ebook pseudorandom-calculated "pages" to be useful reference indicators (and the amusing intersection with acedemia), I no longer hold the delusion that holding onto that word will be helpful to the masses.

Last edited by eschwartz; 07-27-2016 at 09:34 PM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote