View Single Post
Old 07-20-2016, 10:15 AM   #4
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,389
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
In otherwords: they're looking for a faster-responding, three-person, rights-holder-friendly, "yes man" in D.C. to help shortcut due-process when it comes to questions of copyright infringement.
Like the article linked above says, the devil is in the details.

It sounds like a great idea on the surface. I'm all for giving the little guy better and cheaper access to the courts.
Having had to deal with the county superior court this past week, on a matter that was personally significant but not worth a lot of money, I can tell you the current system is sorely lacking.

Last edited by ApK; 07-20-2016 at 10:17 AM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote