Thread: Author Earnings Romance market analysis
View Single Post
Old 07-17-2016, 02:51 AM   #17
Blossom
Treasure Seeker
Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Blossom's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,708
Karma: 26026435
Join Date: Mar 2010
Device: Kobo HD Glo, Kindles, Kindle Fires, Andriod Devices
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeera View Post
I strongly disagree with the "taming of a man" requirement, and much prefer the RWA definition. Romance, of course, also doesn't have to be a hero/heroine. It can be M/F, M/M, F/F, or other combinations.
I think it was Mr. Sparks way of dissing romance but the important part was distinction between love stories and romances he gives.

Yes I agree there can be all sorts of combo couples now days in romances. There is something for everyone.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
Blossom is offline   Reply With Quote