View Single Post
Old 07-16-2016, 05:38 AM   #7
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,476
Karma: 8025702
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
In my experience, the published date provided by the metadata sources is always wrong. It seems that they pick some edition and give you that date. I have seen dates in the 2000s for books published in the '80s. The only time I have seen a correct date is for newly published books, and I suspect that it is correct only because I keep only the year.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote