View Single Post
Old 06-29-2016, 03:09 AM   #453
notimp
Addict
notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 248
Karma: 892441
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: K2i
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinisajoy View Post
Now that you are in the correct forum,
My question shall change.
You keep saying ONLY AMAZON can produce a book using the kfx format.
That is probably true. But, does this mean that the author cannot sell it in another format on another site?
He can.

But Kindle users are disincentivized to buy a "more open format" instead (loophole set aside), because on their readers it lacks features out of the box. Better readability and convenience - vs. caring about important properties of eBooks down the road, is not a fair fight.

What I take offense with is not that there is no way around this, but that it is positioned in a way for people in general to not get what was "once promised" as the norm for eBooks.
And if Amazon never saw ebooks that way - then lets promote that fact.

You could argue, that this is used as a means for integrating customers tighter into the Kindles own ecosystem (exclusive-featuresTM), or that it is the beginning of planned obsolescence (it probably is not - Amazon would take better consumer retention over "pay again for the next version" at this point) -- but all I need to make my argument is to point at the stuff that was lost within the last year.

Look at whats still possible, but not probable - is not something the public should be fobbed of with.

Why do we always have to talk about the publisher and author that can still sell a version of his book to readers on a small lesser known online store (loopholes aside), which then will look worse on Kindles than if the reader would have bought it through Amazon - but that way archiveability or any other user rights necessary for using it with Calibre arent lost?

No - thats not an alternative - and even Amazon acknowledges as much. The ONLY way we can still pronounce this as "workable" is, with them holding open a loophole for the "informed class" of users. And the loophole is out of our hands and will be regulated in the future, by Amazon - as they see fit.

Thats what preps this whole mess up ("At the moment we can still use Calibre..."). Nothing else.

Last edited by notimp; 06-29-2016 at 03:25 AM.
notimp is offline   Reply With Quote