Quote:
Originally Posted by geekmaster
Why would "space travel physics" (where an EM drive belongs) be more appropriate in "politics and religion? It is not politics or religion. It is not theoretical. They have proven working models. It was misunderstood until now, and the authors got it wrong. It is science. Science is not religion.
Or is this thread ONLY for fiction (though not clearly documented as such)? Or is the lough ONLY for fiction (some problem)?
And why is it okay to discuss the invisible man in this thread? Why is the "lounge" the wrong forum to discuss "space travel physics" (except for this thread)? How can I understand the meaning of this?
|
Geekmaster, I have traditionally put cutting edge science/fringe science in the P&R because some of the people here get real upset when you try to make them think "outside the box". You might want to look some of them up, just to see the reactions. . .
Professional courtesy. . .
(Weaponization discussions are for P&R, as well.)