Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I think the way the software currently works is fine, too. I just don't think a "here's what can go wrong IF..." warning could hurt either. It's a pretty drastic procedure to be kicked off with no confirmation.
|
I also think the way the software currently works is fine, but it would even be better, if Sigil displayed a warning, if a document contained missing or invalid fragment ids and a user tried to split it at chapter markers.
Not seeing a missing/invalid fragment id warning would also give users peace of mind that splitting files isn't likely to break any links.