Nope, you're mistaken. And the programmer never said it's impossible to implement my proposed solution – he couldn't say that, because of course it
is possible to implement, since it's implemented in Marvin 2. Rather, Kris has so far refused to even
consider the solution proposed by me, sticking to the preconceived notion that a solution doesn't exist. As I said, the misunderstanding of authors sorting goes back to Marvin 2 and Marvin 1. But in Marvin 2 and Marvin 1, at least, through a lucky coincidence in their development, I'd say, it was possible to arrive at the desired authors sorting. This is no longer possible in Marvin 3, and all we're left with is a clear-cut bug.
