Thread: Marvin 3.0
View Single Post
Old 06-22-2016, 04:24 PM   #175
Faterson
pokrývač škridiel
Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Faterson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Faterson's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,525
Karma: 3300000
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Device: 3*iPad, SamsungNote & Tabs, 2*OnyxBoox, Huawei 8″, PocketBook
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
But it would be nice if we could all admit that there is genuinely a not-very-wonderful position here, and there are things to be said for both sides, and @kguil is within his rights to disagree with you about whether the solution is worth it.
Absolutely. What we need to do here, is to choose the lesser of two evils, because a perfect solution doesn't exist. So, what's the lesser evil here?
  1. The user instructs Marvin to sort by authors' last names, but Marvin 3 ignores that and sorts authors by their first names anyway.
  2. In the comprehensive authors listing, some authors (if the "author sort" meta-tags for some of their books are incorrect) may appear with double, triple, etc. entries – thus signaling to the Marvin user that his/her meta-tags need to be fixed.
Option 1 is the status quo in Marvin 3. Option 2 is my proposal to fix it. Which of the two is the lesser evil? Would anyone really argue it's option no. 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Would it help if I edited my above post, to clarify that I meant the rhetorical "you"?
Nope, not necessary. I've always known and appreciated you as a fair debater, eschwartz. Unlike some hyper-politically-correct posters around here, I never assume ill will on the part of fellow MobileRead contributors. But you've really gotta be thick-skinned to participate here on MobileRead, because ill will is going to be imputed to you by others all the time...
Faterson is offline   Reply With Quote