View Single Post
Old 06-17-2016, 09:22 PM   #10
Hitch
Bookmaker & Cat Slave
Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Hitch's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,503
Karma: 158448243
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Device: K2, iPad, KFire, PPW, Voyage, NookColor. 2 Droid, Oasis, Boox Note2
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
Your Astak is also quite old, isn't it?
Wiseguy. (waves at eschartz)



Quote:
I'm afraid I don't know much about what smartphone/tablet ereader apps are out there, or how they compare.

But I am convinced at least one of them has both a back button and a pagenumber indicator. It is inconceivable that you are the only one who wants a standard feature.
You know what? I'd LIKE it if this could exist. It would solve what is a fairly consistent problem for us, which is making clients happy that want internal linking, for this or that, for "many to one" (anchor/target) linking scenarios.

We have one in, right now. GREAT client, been a delight to work with (would that I could clone this guy and his sister), a book I believe in (non-fiction about saving/finding/etc. lost pets), etc. In the course of the book, they have numerous "see XXXX" links. And they are the many to one type. Many "See XXX," with a shared target. Not all, of course, but if there are 10 target resources, let's say there are 50 departure points. The client happens to have a reader that, lo, does not have a "back" button. (n.b.: not all that we have here, do either).

They asked me for this x-refs, and we obliged. In testing them, he realized that no matter how many times he clicked "back" the back link wouldn't go to the 2nd, 3rd, etc., in sequence. I wish I could make it so. I do.

BTW: This, along with font-embedding, seems to be one of those things that I don't explain well. The many-to-one linking problem (for glossaries and the like).

AND, may I add, many of the desktop software readers don't have BACK buttons, either.

Just sayin'.

Hitch
Hitch is offline   Reply With Quote