View Single Post
Old 06-09-2016, 02:34 PM   #837
Blossom
Treasure Seeker
Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Blossom's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,708
Karma: 26026435
Join Date: Mar 2010
Device: Kobo HD Glo, Kindles, Kindle Fires, Andriod Devices
Quote:
Originally Posted by Froide View Post
Right. Both meanings are derogatory. The definition Blossom cited implies the work is poorly written or unimportant. The one I offered implies more about the nature of the characters and/or plot. Any book, in any genre, can fit one or both definitions, but the definitions have different meanings. I won't say more on the subject, though, as I think we're beating a dead horse.
They pretty much mean the same thing. If any of those elements are trashy then the book is of poor quality. You can not have one without the other. They are interchangeable.

Adding sex scenes does not change the quality of the book unless they are badly or awkwardly written because the author hasn't written them before but that doesn't really say the book is trashy. The trashy term is so derogatory it should never be used unless the book is poorly done or badly written.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk

Last edited by Blossom; 06-09-2016 at 02:42 PM.
Blossom is offline   Reply With Quote