View Single Post
Old 06-09-2016, 10:52 AM   #832
Froide
Wizard
Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Froide ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Froide's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,898
Karma: 9851695
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Noo Yawk
Device: Samsung Galaxy and Windows devices. RIP: Palm & Nook devices.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blossom View Post
Trashy by definition means of poor or inferior quality. To call romances trashy is to say they are junk. In this particular case using the term implies all romances with sex scenes are poor quality. We all know that is not true.

What of other genres that have sex in them? Does this make them trashy too? it's just a term that is almost always taken out of context. We romance readers should not be shamed for reading books with sex in them. Misinformed people use terms like trashy, smut, mommy porn to describe romance and I'm just so tired of it.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
You've accurately cited the dictionary definition, found here. But many people also refer to as "trashy" artworks, behaviors, cars, clothing, language, people, etc., that are tasteless, garish, slovenly, inappropriately bellicose or aggressive, promiscuous, inappropriately loud, inappropriately sexual, etc. I gather this second context, not the first, is what the poster was referring to in this context.
Froide is offline   Reply With Quote