View Single Post
Old 06-03-2016, 10:45 PM   #28
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,393
Karma: 68715774
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerem0ny View Post
Then of course, there are people in denial who refuse to accept there are any faulty devices at all! [...]
Take another swig when someone rolls their eyes at you for being too fussy . Stay positive peeps!
I won't roll my eyes about that, and I'm not in denial (I have no opinion on the Voyage or Oasis screens, having little experience with either), but I will roll my eyes at this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerem0ny View Post
Regardless there are enough defective units to warrant an article in the LA times about it.
Please. He's a writer in the popular press, not an investigator for the FTC. All the article means is that the writer found some opinions on the Interwebs consistent with his own opinion and the story he wanted to write.
I'm not saying the defects aren't real, just that that article isn't necessarily "warranted" by anything of the sort.

To be clear, this post is a rant on the state of journalism and the media, not on the defects in the Oasis screen, which, again, I have no opinion on.

ApK

Last edited by ApK; 06-03-2016 at 10:47 PM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote