View Single Post
Old 05-28-2016, 05:26 AM   #54
fantasyfan
Wizard
fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fantasyfan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
fantasyfan's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,376
Karma: 28116892
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, iPad 9th gen. IPhone 11
I found it to be an enjoyable read and I may well continue the series. As to the genre perhaps it could be classed as "science fantasy" a term recognised in the "Encyclopedia of Science Fiction" though they do state that it was in general use primarily between 1950-1966. Science fantasy does not necessarily contain the types of magical characters found in pure fantasy but "these may be present, often in a quasirationalizesd form." I think that Meredith Ann Pierce does create a kind of science fantasy in her "Dark Angel" sequence. The "Incomplete Enchanter" by de Camp and Pratt would be another.

I think that Pierce puts the emphasis on science and de Camp/Pratt on fantasy. Though I suppose that hairsplitting categories isn't all that important, I very much enjoy the unique approach of Kerstein in her book.
fantasyfan is offline   Reply With Quote