View Single Post
Old 05-27-2016, 02:37 PM   #18
latepaul
Wizard
latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
latepaul's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,270
Karma: 10468300
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
In all honesty I can see no reason why an API would not be protected by copyright. Is the design of an API not a creative process? If it is (and it certainly seems to me that it is) then it should automatically be protected by copyright under the Berne Convention.

Does anyone know what the arguments are to the contrary?
I don't know the legal arguments but from a point of principle I don't they should be. APIs are the connecting tissue of different pieces of software that interact. If it becomes impossible to implement a third party API due to copyright restriction then that discourages rather than encourages creativity - which is the intent behind copyright.
latepaul is offline   Reply With Quote