View Single Post
Old 05-25-2016, 03:13 AM   #19
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by encol View Post
Just to know it: with the latest firmware i can reach the "zero" by only sliding
It might be a combination of how much larger the control area is than the visible graphics
vs
How large a person's finger is.

Seriously.

Plus -

Regardless of the firmware version, for at least the capacitive touchscreen devices (the K5 and KT2 are IR scanners) -

There is a calibration routine that the end user can not reach that controls the alignment of the touch location detection vs the displayed graphics.
I have one PW-1 whose alignment is offset to the right enough that it extends to a stip of the bezel. (makes using that one fun at times)

The actual alignment of touch detected location vs graphics location adds another variable to this testing.

Last edited by knc1; 05-25-2016 at 03:16 AM.
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote