View Single Post
Old 05-23-2016, 06:58 AM   #276
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773670
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Rob Landley has something interesting to say about why the linux filesystem tree is the way it is:
Quote:
Note that we skip the various "move stuff from /usr/bin to /bin" steps because /lib, /bin, and /sbin are all symlinks to the appropriate directory under /usr so we've already combined all that stuff already. (That split happened when Ken and Dennis filled up their original root filesystem's RK05 disk pack on the PDP-11 they developed Unix on in 1971, so they let their operating system files leak into the second disk, where all the user directories lived. They eventually added a third disk on /home and moved the user directories to there, but kept the OS straddling two disks. These days between initramfs and cheap multi-terrabyte drives that split is a useless historical artifact kept alive by people blindly following procedures they no longer understand. Don't get me started on /opt.)
For those who weren't paying attention "that day" in Unix history class, Ken and Dennis mentioned above are Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie (but real Unix-ish history buffs only use their first names).

So basically, the traditional linux file system tree is just a modern version of "The Pot Roast Story", so there is no sane reason it must remain that way.

Rob Landley also strongly recommended linuxfromscratch.com, but that domain name is now owned by a domain troll offering it up for sale for a mere $499 (they usually try to sell my choicest expired domains back to me to $10,000 each, but mine were GOOD). Anyway, you can still visit linuxfromscratch.org (before it bit-rots away too)...

Last edited by geekmaster; 05-23-2016 at 09:31 AM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote