Quote:
Originally Posted by geekmaster
I tried replacing the function name (bunzip2 in this case) with $0, and it works fine on my system. That way all the "symlink-replacement" files can be identical, except for their filenames. Is there any reason NOT to do that (other than the fact that busybox config can build equivalent files for you)?
|
I don't think it would support:
sh -c bunzip2 .....
situations.
or some other corner case usage of some sort (brain is still asleep).