View Single Post
Old 05-21-2016, 05:13 AM   #10
baf
Evangelist
baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.baf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 405
Karma: 2330752
Join Date: May 2012
Device: kt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doitsu View Post
If you used KindleUnpack, you can't be sure since it'll only output known attributes and exact="yes" wasn't part of the original Mobipocket specs.
I compared compiled binary files.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doitsu View Post
Did you also test the two variations on an actual Kindle and did you get the same results for both versions? (I only tested my version and it worked.)
I did some tests on your opf. One test with exact keyword and one without. It confirmed that the binaries don't differ in indices section, nor in metadata, except for some unique ids.

Both dictionaries work the same on my KT.
When searching from the search box (index items) it doesn't recognise different forms of the words. Whatever I type in the search box it brings first entry: "łaska". It is probably limitation of the reader's fuzzy search.
At the same time both dictionaries work correctly when highlighting word in a document. Highlighting "łaska" brings pop-up definition for "łaska", highlighting "laska" shows "laska".

Maybe some other conditions must be fulfilled in order to make the keyword be used.
baf is offline   Reply With Quote