View Single Post
Old 05-11-2016, 04:24 PM   #106
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773670
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1 View Post
-mtune=xscale -mno-unaligned-access
The compiler said "cc1.exe: error: invalid option `no-unaligned-access'".

Just adding "-mtune=xscale" makes the K1 still say "Illegal instruction".

However, that seems better than a segfault or "not found", I think. Now, if we can just sweep out those pesky illegal instructions, all would be well, eh?

EDIT: This is gcc 3.4.4: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3...M-Options.html
I find it strange that the gcc 3.4.4 docs list -mno-unaligned-access as valid, but the compiler complains and abort...

Last edited by geekmaster; 05-11-2016 at 04:35 PM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote