View Single Post
Old 05-04-2016, 09:03 PM   #51
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynx-lynx View Post
okay, so I'm still a bit confused .....

I refer to the original of the art work and the fact there there is no 'royalty' associated with the sale. So, once the creator sells it then it's financial remuneration is satisfied irrespective of mow many times, over x years/centuries, it's on-sold.

There apparently is quite a market in art forgeries, but I make no comment about that market.
And now I am confused.

Why on earth would resale get the creator a royalty, any more than resale of used paper books?
Or selling a house for the fifteenth time should get the construction crew a new salary???


That has nothing whatsoever to do with copyright!
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote