View Single Post
Old 05-04-2016, 11:38 AM   #38
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by shalym View Post
Because a house has to be maintained and the property tax needs to be paid on it.

Royalty income comes in whether you do anything or not.

Shari
Then let's suppose instead that the heirs sell the house and get the money that way. Either way you appear to be saying (and please correct me if I've misunderstood you) that it's fine for heirs to benefit from property, but not from royalty payments. I see absolutely no difference between the two.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote