Thread: Inconsistencies in Remove unused CSS rules!?
View Single Post
Old 04-27-2016, 02:46 PM   #8
theducks
Well trained by Cats
theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
theducks's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,115
Karma: 60406498
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaot View Post
@theducks, thank you! We're getting closer.

It is not evil or even pedantic when I translate your post for any other less experienced mb-user.



Right, I noticed that already this afternoon during my experiments, here exactly 1296 changes of unused classes from the HTML (Official parlance).
Should your objection to be understood generally as to the tick box to let uncrossed?

I understand the words, but not the meaning. As elsewhere already made known: I need examples, examples and examples again.

May I call a previously asked question in memory?
Were/how is to run that demo program test.cpp (test.zip)?
[/QUOTE]

Yes, remove the tick. Missing styles only leave bulky HTML (they will be ignored)


Fake = Guess what it should have been

Forget about doing anything about QT bugs. That is for developers who KNOW.

All we need to know is: There is one that can bite
theducks is offline   Reply With Quote