Quote:
Originally Posted by Andurian
I'm at work and can't post links, just cut and paste text, which is why I posted the source and date. That said, aside from the fact I didn't post the entire article, please explain to me how a lack of context makes what I posted easy to misinterpret. If anything the text I ommitted makes it clear that it really is *his* "answer thus" and not that of someone else.
Certainly an accusation that I've "twisted" his words is offensive and inaccurate. Are you often like this?
|
You called him a traitor, but he does not say that violent rebellion _should_ occur, nor does he tell the reader to start one. A better summary would be that he thinks one might happen. This is not the same thing.