View Single Post
Old 04-22-2016, 07:45 PM   #3
goldilocks
Addict
goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.goldilocks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 344
Karma: 1222222
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Florida
Device: Sony PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks View Post
Published comes from Metadata.
It could be within the book (initial entry in Calibre)
or Later downloaded (updated in Calibre)

This may be Site dependent (somewhat depending on how many Metadata Source PI are configured). If the same site supplies the Pubdate, there may be a scraping problem due to a site change. Yo need to figure where the wrong data comes from.

1) If it is bad in the book ++>Blame the Publisher
2) If it turns out all those WERE Apr2014 ++> Blame the Purchaser
Ok, I'm going with 1) since I didn't do anything with the books but import them. I took a look at the content.opf and it shows: <dc:date>2014</dc:date>. But no date with data that says published. I guess Calibre can only put the current month if there isn't one listed.

theducks, thanks for your response...
goldilocks is offline   Reply With Quote