View Single Post
Old 04-06-2016, 01:24 PM   #142
fbrzvnrnd
Fanatic
fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fbrzvnrnd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 559
Karma: 400004
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: ONYX M96
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
People already don't use the semantic tools currently at their disposal with any sort of consistency. As such, I certainly don't see any advantage to a more complex and/or rigid specification that no two existing, industry-standard programs (which authors use to write/produce) would interpret consistently when producing their underlying markup.
Publisher use it. We use it, and year by year, more and more are using it to create indexes and other tools to read, search, navigate ebooks. Tools? We have a language to query microdata: XQuery. And tools like ePubEditor that allows query "live".
fbrzvnrnd is offline   Reply With Quote