View Single Post
Old 04-04-2016, 04:02 PM   #8
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
On the QtWebKit front, it appears every distro is resolved to continue providing it.


Regarding QtWebEngine...
Arch Linux enables use_proprietary_codecs
So does Gentoo via a USE flag -- although Gentoo has not updated Qt to 5.6.0 yet, so I looked at the Qt testing overlays.

On the other hand, it sounds like Debian and Redhat are in a real snit about it.
I cannot find any Debian QtWebEngine package at all, and it doesn't appear Fedora enables use_proprietary_codecs.

Both seem to object because of licensing crap. It reminds me why I prefer Arch Linux in the first place. Debian and their "Social Contract" are far more interested in making some sort of cleverly inscrutable political statement than having working software.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote