View Single Post
Old 03-30-2016, 02:08 PM   #46
bookman156
Addict
bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 368
Karma: 1000000
Join Date: Mar 2016
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
In that case the title is part of the citation/reference. It is not the title of the book/document itself.

To me it seems they are trying to make HTML more semantic, but they do it only partially and not consistent. Anyway, I don't want to be depending on a renderer to decide who things must look as this is not defined in the standard. If they would specify the standard rendering of a semantic tag, it could be easily used and overruled. It is almost impossible to prevent every possible layout that a renderer could apply to a tag as their standard.
Just a title on its own they regard as something for <cite>. See their Doctor Who example. But I tend to agree it is a bit flaky, since they regard an author name as something to use <cite> on too, whereas in actual practice you wouldn't usually want to differentiate such text. They have the strange example of Charles Bukowski. As far as I'm concerned, that's just a name. But Love is a dog from hell is a book title and should be italicised.
bookman156 is offline   Reply With Quote