View Single Post
Old 03-15-2016, 02:23 AM   #8
bookman156
Addict
bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bookman156 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 368
Karma: 1000000
Join Date: Mar 2016
Device: none
If you can build that in, then why not have the ability to select validation against CSS 2.1 or CSS 3 irrespective of whether it is EPUB 2 or EPUB 3, because, frankly, even if working on EPUB 2 I still want to test against CSS 3 and if I can't do it automatically in Sigil I'll just have to do it manually outside. Making this a preference would be far more useful, since validation against CSS 2.1 isn't much use if valid styles that work in epubs are being reported as errors. So basically I have to trust myself not to use any style that won't work, which I'll see in testing anyway. All I want to know from the validator is that my CSS file itself is correctly formed and doesn't contain errors as a CSS file, no matter whether I'm using EPUB 2 or 3. This is the proper use of a CSS validator.

Last edited by bookman156; 03-15-2016 at 02:26 AM.
bookman156 is offline   Reply With Quote