View Single Post
Old 03-10-2016, 06:21 PM   #7
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackie_w View Post
I have a strong personal preference for 1800-1899, 1960-69 etc., even if that might make others consider me an uneducated total Philistine
Not a Philistine at all. It simply depends what you want to use the ranges for. Eg, the 20th century ran from 1901 to 2000 (that's a matter of definition, not opinion), but it's far more common to speak of "the 1970s" (1970 to 1979) than of "the 8th decade of the 20th century" (1971 to 1980).
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote