Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
The fact that it was a majority opinion would seem to indicate that it wasn't a clear-cut case. More judges disagreed with Apple than agreed with them, but the fact that there was a dissenting minority would suggest that, in the eyes of that minority, their case had merit.
|
The minority was one judge. Who was reaching beyond precedent and seeking to narrow the scope of antitrust law.
The SCOTUS declined that invitation.
Apple's next move is to petition the president for a pardon early next January.
Many a white collar convict does that.